March 9th, 2020
Annie Jiang
Period 2
Sophomores 2020
Aim: How can the elevator pitch and consultant protocol provide clarity and feedback for our fable project?
Notes
Today we gathered in our groups to discuss each of our fables for the project. We completed parts of the peer-editing process in “rounds.” In these rounds, we created and shared short summaries, “elevator pitches,” and we gave each other constructive criticism.
Round 1
Create an elevator pitch for the fable you created. Your pitch should address the moral you chose and the fable story idea you related from the outline. Be prepared to “pitch” your idea to your team in Round 2.
- For the first round we prepared short and simple summaries about our original fables individually.
Round 2
Presenter: You will pitch your idea to your teammates.
Teammates: Listen carefully/actively to the presenter. Record probing questions.
- Everyone in the team shared their “elevator pitches.” I found that everybody’s stories and morals varied greatly.
Round 3
Teammates: Have 1 minute to ask the presenters any probing questions.
Presenter: Record the feedback you receive.
- During this round, questions like “How did this event happen?” or “Why was this animal chosen to represent a character?” popped up.
Round 4
Teammates: Have 1 minute to bring (concrete/takeaway) suggestions to the presenters.
Presenter: Record the feedback you receive.
- We gave each other criticism on what could be improved. I found that for my own story I should add more detail to make it clearer.
Reflection
Today we learned an effective way to give and receive feedback on our fables. We created elevator pitches and presented them among our groups. We learned this because this allows for us to see our stories from multiple perspectives and find different approaches to the same thing. Moving forward, I will apply the feedback I had received to my fable. Using the feedback will help my fable become the best version that it can be.
No comments:
Post a Comment